Citation Quality

From RootsMagic Wiki
Revision as of 05:14, 28 August 2021 by Renee (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Navigation: RootsMagic 8 > Working With Sources >


RootsMagic lets you apply a quality rating to each use of your citations based on the industry-standard Elizabeth Shown Mills, "Process Map for Evidence Analysis", Evidence Explained: Citing History Sources from Artifacts to Cyberspace (Baltimore, Maryland: Genealogy Publishing, 2007).

From her discussion, Sources give us information from which we select evidence for analysis. A sound conclusion may be considered Proof.

To enter your quality ratings After careful analysis and evaluation of the associated source, you can enter a quality rating in each of three factors that best describes the results of your analysis.

You will see the 3 Quality options when you are editing a citation on the edit person form. Just click each item and select the appropriate value from the drop list that appears.

Citation 1

Source

  • Original - This source is in its first recorded form
  • Derivative - This source is extracted, transcribed or otherwise derived from the original
  • Don't know

Information

  • Primary - This information was provided by someone with firsthand knowledge of the person or fact
  • Secondary - This information was provided by someone with secondhand knowledge of the person or fact
  • Don't know

Evidence

  • Direct - This source answers the research question by itself
  • Indirect - This source is relevant, but needs additional information
  • Negative - This source is missing information that it should contain
  • Don't know

The quality is at the citation use level, since the same source (or even the same citation) can have a different quality depending on what it is used for. For example, a birth certificate could have a different quality depending on whether it was used for the person's birth, or used for the father's place of birth.