Difference between revisions of "RootsMagic 8:Citation Quality"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | RootsMagic lets you apply a quality rating to each of your | + | RootsMagic lets you apply a quality rating to each use of your citations based on the industry-standard Elizabeth Shown Mills, "Process Map for Evidence Analysis", Evidence Explained: Citing History Sources from Artifacts to Cyberspace (Baltimore, Maryland: Genealogy Publishing, 2007). |
From her discussion, Sources give us information from which we select evidence for analysis. A sound conclusion may be considered Proof. | From her discussion, Sources give us information from which we select evidence for analysis. A sound conclusion may be considered Proof. | ||
To enter your quality ratings | To enter your quality ratings | ||
| − | After careful analysis and evaluation of the associated source, you can enter a quality rating in each of | + | After careful analysis and evaluation of the associated source, you can enter a quality rating in each of three factors that best describes the results of your analysis. |
| + | |||
| + | [[File:RM8_EditPerson-Citation-1.jpg|Citation 1]] | ||
Revision as of 01:46, 20 August 2021
Navigation: RootsMagic 8 > Working With Sources >
RootsMagic lets you apply a quality rating to each use of your citations based on the industry-standard Elizabeth Shown Mills, "Process Map for Evidence Analysis", Evidence Explained: Citing History Sources from Artifacts to Cyberspace (Baltimore, Maryland: Genealogy Publishing, 2007).
From her discussion, Sources give us information from which we select evidence for analysis. A sound conclusion may be considered Proof.
To enter your quality ratings After careful analysis and evaluation of the associated source, you can enter a quality rating in each of three factors that best describes the results of your analysis.
